• Sign In/Sign On
    • Register
    • Log In
    • Heights Observer main site login
  • Rules/FAQ
  • Heights Observer
  • About
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Heights Observer Blog

A community blog about life in the Heights

  • HOME
  • BLOGGERS
    • Emily E. Brock
    • Robert Brown
    • Patti Carlyle
    • Andrea Davis
    • Adam Dew
    • Deanna Bremer Fisher
    • Mike Gaynier
    • Tiffany Laufer
    • Anne McFarland
    • Fran Mentch
    • Jewel Moulthrop
    • David Perelman-Hall
    • Jan Resseger
    • Bob Rosenbaum
    • Kim Sergio Inglis
    • Jim Simler on Film
    • Richard Stewart
    • Allen Wilkinson
    • GUEST BLOGGERS
  • Quality of Life
    • Arts and Entertainment
    • People/Personalities
    • Shop Local
    • Things to do
  • Multimedia
    • Photo Blog
    • Video Blog
    • Podcast
  • Government
    • Schools
      • CH-UH School Facilities Conversation at The Civic Commons
    • Development
    • Public Safety
      • Citizens Police Academy
  • Cle Hts
  • U Hts
  • Regional
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Meadowbrook-Lee: The Market and Lincoln Institute of Land Policy say we should move on

Fran Mentch · October 5, 2012 · 5 Comments

 

According to Cleveland Heights city officials and the CH-UH Board of Education, the Orlean Company’s proposed development plan for Meadowbrook-Lee has been removed from consideration and a new one is being drawn up. The Orlean plan included an 11-year 80% tax abatement and the donation of the city land to the developer; a combined $4 million public subsidy. It is important to note that this plan included a commercial tax abatement-the first commercial tax abatement the city has offered.

 

 

To review:

  • Cleveland Heights City Council tried to develop Meadowbrook-Lee in 2007 and 2008.
  • In November 2011 they put out a request for proposals for this property.
  • City Council received 3 responses and selected the Orlean Company’s proposal.
  • The Orlean Company was willing to move forward if they receive the $4 million subsidy mentioned above.

Cleveland Heights City Council has tried for 5 years to entice “the market” to build on Meadowbrook-Lee. The market’s response has been one developer coming forward with a plan and that plan requires a $4 million residential and commercial subsidy.

I am very glad to hear that the Orleans Company plan is off the table and I thank city officials for their decision.

City Council’s decision is supported by a national study by the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy called Rethinking Property Tax Incentives for Business (June 2012). Their recommendation for local government officials is as follows:

“Local government officials can make wiser use of property tax incentives for business and avoid such incentives when their costs exceed their benefits. Localities should set clear criteria for the types of projects eligible for incentives; limit tax breaks to mobile facilities that export goods or services out of the region; involve tax administrators and other stakeholders in decisions to grant incentives; cooperate on economic development with other jurisdictions in the area; and be clear from the outset that not all businesses that ask for an incentive will receive one.” (p. 3)

So, “The Market” and the Lincoln Institute of Land Policy say we should move on.

I hope we move on to something that reflects our better selves, something beautiful, creative, and interesting. Something inspiring that will help us all enjoy each other.  For that we can turn to the spirit of Thomas Hoving to help us create a “City of Earthly Delights”.

I would like to hear from others: What do you think?

__________________________________________

P.S. To read about the Lincoln Land Institute and its Cleveland connection, click here.

Thanks again to Ralph Solonitz for his artist’s rendering of Meadow Brooklee.

facebookShare on Facebook
TwitterTweet
FollowFollow us

Filed Under: Cleveland Heights, Development Tagged With: CHUH Board Of Education, Heights City Council, Tax Abatement

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. doctorgilgul says

    October 31, 2012 at 5:05 pm

    I can appreciate your concern and point of view re. the lee meadowbrook property. As a local that spends time daily around this spot, it’s obvious that the potential for this area is wide open. But rather than commenting on politics in the Heights, I was concerned of your choice of cartoons representing your blog. Why would you put a negative image of a character eating Mitchell’s candy.
    Since some three quarters of a century, Mitchell’s candy store has brought smiles to so many people here and around the world. We have a jewel that has been a part of living in the heights for many. Why didn’t you choose to put Malley’s on that box. Putting down our business community in these cartoons doesn’t give strength to talking about the the failure of our city planners.

    Reply
    • Fran Mentch says

      November 1, 2012 at 12:11 pm

      We have removed the drawing that was offensive to Mr. Mitchell and have replaced it.

      As the great philosopher John Dewey pointed out, business and citizens are in a community and must treat each other morally and ethically and work together for the welfare of the whole community.
      We all have to work together.

      We thank whoever read and commented on this blog–all 6 of us!

      Reply
      • Garry Kanter says

        November 1, 2012 at 7:12 pm

        Good move, Fran & Ralph!

        He didn’t even request that did he, he just griped, right?

        Reply
  2. Fran Mentch says

    November 1, 2012 at 12:51 am

    My apologies, I never meant to put anyone down by the use of the drawing; I don’t see the drawing of the woman named Meadow Brooklee as a negative image.

    I hope you can see that STOPPING a tax abated project that includes $1 million land giveaway ($1 million of mostly tax dollars)will actually HELP LOCAL BUSINESSES.

    My blog posts about Meadowbrook-Lee have all SUPPORTED the businesses that are currently on Lee. I am working to prevent building something that will provide unfair competition to the businesses and rental units in the area.

    As I have mentioned before, pick out the coffee shop you want to close–Phoenix or Stone Oven–because a coffee shop is planned for the first floor of this subsidized development.

    I AM TRYING TO HELP PRESERVE LOCAL BUSINESSES.

    Reply
    • Garry Kanter says

      November 1, 2012 at 4:07 am

      That idea never once occurred to me.

      I don’t think too many of the smiling people here and around the world would have taken anything negative about Mitchell’s fine confections from Ralph’s cartoon, or your blog.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Assignment: Life in the Heights

This community blog site is part of the Heights Observer community-building project in Cleveland Heights and University Heights. Anyone with a stake in the community is invited to contribute relevant content.

The Heights Observer is published by non-profit FutureHeights. Opinions expressed here are solely those of each author and do not reflect the position of the publisher.

Contact the webmaster to post a blog.

Register or login to comment. To maintain civility and accountability, register with your real name – first and last. Anonymous contributions will be deleted.

See Rules/FAQs for more detail.

NOTE: This blog site operates on a different platform than the Heights Observer’s main website and requires a separate login.

Please follow us and share

RSS
Follow by Email
Facebook
Facebook
fb-share-icon
Twitter
Visit Us
Follow Me
Post on X

Categories

Keyword search

Footer

Please follow us and share

RSS
Follow by Email
Facebook
Facebook
fb-share-icon
Twitter
Visit Us
Follow Me
Post on X

This website is part of the Heights Observer, a volunteer-based hyper-local community news project of non-profit FutureHeights.

excellence awards 20
Excellence in Journalism 2019

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in