• Sign In/Sign On
    • Register
    • Log In
    • Heights Observer main site login
  • Rules/FAQ
  • Heights Observer
  • About
  • Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Heights Observer Blog

A community blog about life in the Heights

  • HOME
  • BLOGGERS
    • Emily E. Brock
    • Robert Brown
    • Patti Carlyle
    • Andrea Davis
    • Adam Dew
    • Deanna Bremer Fisher
    • Mike Gaynier
    • Tiffany Laufer
    • Anne McFarland
    • Fran Mentch
    • Jewel Moulthrop
    • David Perelman-Hall
    • Jan Resseger
    • Bob Rosenbaum
    • Kim Sergio Inglis
    • Jim Simler on Film
    • Richard Stewart
    • Allen Wilkinson
    • GUEST BLOGGERS
  • Quality of Life
    • Arts and Entertainment
    • People/Personalities
    • Shop Local
    • Things to do
  • Multimedia
    • Photo Blog
    • Video Blog
    • Podcast
  • Government
    • Schools
      • CH-UH School Facilities Conversation at The Civic Commons
    • Development
    • Public Safety
      • Citizens Police Academy
  • Cle Hts
  • U Hts
  • Regional
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Meadowbrook-Lee: Get your checkbooks out!

Fran Mentch · September 18, 2012 · 1 Comment

We could debate all day about whether or not developing Meadowbrook-Lee is a good idea. But that is really beside the point.

Cleveland Heights City Council is asking for approval from the CH-UH Board of Education for an 11-year 80% tax abatement on the proposed project.

Two troubling questions arise that will affect all of us financially:

The questions are:
1.    Should the city GIVE a developer a piece of property that has over $1 million of public money invested in it? These tax dollars were used to ready it for market, not to give it away.

2.   Should a tax abatement be provided to the developer?
Here’s the breakdown of how our tax dollars were spent on this property.

  • Purchase Ohio Savings                                           $60,000 plus transfer costs.
    Purchase Clancy’s gas station:                                $205,000 plus transfer costs
    Purchase 3 residential properties on Tullamore: $320,000
    Environmental remediation grant to city:             $400,000
    PUSTR Funds (not tax dollars) for remediation of underground storage tank issues. $147,600.

Total tax dollars: $985,000.
Total money invested in the land thus far: $985,000 + $147,600=$1,112,600

It should be noted that this proposal includes the first time that the city has offered BOTH a COMMERCIAL and RESIDENTIAL tax abatement.

Giving a COMMERCIAL tax abatement is a dangerous precedent. If we say yes to Orlean Company, how can we say no to anyone else?

Tax abatements shift the economic burden off the developer and on to everyone else who pays taxes. The proposed tax abatement of $3,080,000 is $154.35 for each of the 19,954 households in Cleveland Heights. (This does not include the value of the land.)

We all know that our school district needs all the money it can get. Now and in the next few years while it implements its building plan.

Please contact the Board of Education and tell them you oppose this tax abatement and ask them to vote it down.
My husband and I are not willing to write a check to the Orlean Company for $154.35.

Are you?

P.S. I am proud to introduce Meadow Brooklee, a drawing inspired by the Orlean Company’s statement (English majors be prepared to cringe): “Municipally owned land on the east side of Lee Road, between Tullamore and Lee Roads has sat fallow for several years”.  Artist Ralph Solonitz put his intriguing mind and talented hands to work and drew a picture of Meadow Brooklee “sitting fallow”. To see more of Ralph’s wonderful drawings, visit his Facebook page.

Impact Study

facebookShare on Facebook
TwitterTweet
FollowFollow us

Filed Under: Cleveland Heights, Development, Fran Mentch, Government Tagged With: Ralph Solonitz

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Garry Kanter says

    September 18, 2012 at 1:06 pm

    Until the CH city council opens their eyes to how grossly overstated and unattainable the “benefits” are, and gets an independent appraisal on the parcels as a whole – *our* parcels, not theirs, the BOE would be lowering their own standards by voting “Yes”.

    This proposed giveaway of taxpayer assets needs to be stopped!!!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Assignment: Life in the Heights

This community blog site is part of the Heights Observer community-building project in Cleveland Heights and University Heights. Anyone with a stake in the community is invited to contribute relevant content.

The Heights Observer is published by non-profit FutureHeights. Opinions expressed here are solely those of each author and do not reflect the position of the publisher.

Contact the webmaster to post a blog.

Register or login to comment. To maintain civility and accountability, register with your real name – first and last. Anonymous contributions will be deleted.

See Rules/FAQs for more detail.

NOTE: This blog site operates on a different platform than the Heights Observer’s main website and requires a separate login.

Please follow us and share

RSS
Follow by Email
Facebook
Facebook
fb-share-icon
Twitter
Visit Us
Follow Me
Post on X

Categories

Keyword search

Footer

Please follow us and share

RSS
Follow by Email
Facebook
Facebook
fb-share-icon
Twitter
Visit Us
Follow Me
Post on X

This website is part of the Heights Observer, a volunteer-based hyper-local community news project of non-profit FutureHeights.

excellence awards 20
Excellence in Journalism 2019

Copyright © 2025 · Daily Dish Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in